That’s not what I suggested, although since you brought it up,…
…0.0002% will probably not be too far off actual experience for the vast majority of the population who are not elderly and/or in otherwise poor health.
At the end of the day, Sixer, you and I are both stuck in the position of having to prove a negative, so we’ll remain at loggerheads. That’s fine. My main point is that when something is (hypothetically) reduced in probability from 0.2% to 0.1% or 0.02% to 0.01% or 0.002% to 0.001% or what-the-hell-ever, it just doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. Attention would be far better focused elsewhere.
[Post edited by Los Angeles Hoo at 12/05/2021 5:15PM]
|
(
In response to this post by SixerHoo)
Posted: 12/05/2021 at 5:13PM